Blueberry mechanical harvesters cause bruise damage to the fruit. The goal of this study was to test a custom-made sensor (berry impact recording device) to measure the quality and magnitude of mechanical impacts created by three major types of commercial blueberry mechanical harvesters (rotary, slapper, and sway). The sensor was mounted on blueberry bushes (cultivated) and harvested at standard operating conditions such that the sensor was detached and experienced the impact forces typically found during a mechanical harvesting process. The data collected by the sensor revealed that the slapper and sway harvesters generated not only larger number
Blueberry mechanical harvesters cause bruise damage to the fruit. The goal of this study was to test a custom-made sensor (berry impact recording device) to measure the quality and magnitude of mechanical impacts created by three major types of commercial blueberry mechanical harvesters (rotary, slapper, and sway). The sensor was mounted on blueberry bushes (cultivated) and harvested at standard operating conditions such that the sensor was detached and experienced the impact forces typically found during a mechanical harvesting process. The data collected by the sensor revealed that the slapper and sway harvesters generated not only larger number but also higher magnitude impacts than the rotary. Our analyses suggest that these disparities were mostly caused by different agitating mechanisms, contacting surface materials, and designs between the three harvesters. Results indicated that most impacts lasted 5?7 ms in all three harvesters. The distribution of the impacts showed that 90% of impacts from the rotary were less than 190 g and 90% of impacts from the slapper and sway were less than 250 g. Corresponding measures were identified to reduce potential bruise damage in the harvesters. The information could be useful to select harvesters that create the least impacts and to improve current mechanical harvester designs. Highlights A miniature instrumented sphere was used to compare three blueberry harvesters. The data suggested that the rotary harvester is superior to the other two. The plastic conveyer belt created smaller impacts than the steel conveyer belt. The majority of impacts created by the three harvesters were small impacts. This study provided valuable information to improve current blueberry harvesters. Complete list of authors and sourcePengcheng Yua, Changying Lia, cyli@uga.edu, Fumiomi Takedab, Gerard Krewerc, Glen Rainsd, Takoi HamritaeComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, Volume 101, February 2014, Pages 84?92, Abstract ?