Actualidad

For plastic canopy covers in table grapes, white covers seems to be preferable to green since green covers were associated with higher temperatures

California table grape (Vitis vinifera) growers cover the canopies of late-season varieties with plastic (polyethylene) covers to shield the fruit from rain. Green- or white-colored covers are commonly used, but there is lack of information whether either cover might be preferable based on canopy microclimate or fruit quality. In late September, ?Redglobe? (in 2011) and ?Autumn King? (in 2012) table grapevines were covered with green or white plastic, or left uncovered, and canopy microclimate, fungal and bacterial rot incidence, and fruit yield and

uva-malla
15 September, 2021

Redaccion

California table grape (Vitis vinifera) growers cover the canopies of late-season varieties with plastic (polyethylene) covers to shield the fruit from rain. Green- or white-colored covers are commonly used, but there is lack of information whether either cover might be preferable based on canopy microclimate or fruit quality. In late September, ?Redglobe? (in 2011) and ?Autumn King? (in 2012) table grapevines were covered with green or white plastic, or left uncovered, and canopy microclimate, fungal and bacterial rot incidence, and fruit yield and quality at harvest, and after postharvest storage, were evaluated. Green covers were more transparent and less reflective than white covers, and daily maximum temperature difference in the top center of the canopies of grapevine with green covers was consistently >5 ?C than that of grapevine subjected to other treatments, but covers had little effect on temperatures in the fruit zones, which were not enveloped by covers. Effects on relative humidity (RH) depended on location within the canopy and time of day; RH peaked in early morning and was at a minimum in late afternoon. All cover treatments had relatively similar peak RH in south-facing fruit zones and the top center of the canopy. However, in the north-facing fruit zone, vines with green covers had higher RH at night than vines subjected to other treatments. Both covers consistently reduced evaporative potential in the top center of the canopy, but not in fruit zones. Treatment effects on condensation beneath the covers were inconsistent, possibly due to differences in canopy size, variety, or season, but south-facing cover surfaces generally had less condensation than the top or north-facing surfaces. About 0.5 inch of rain fell on 5 Oct. 2011, but no rain occurred during the 2012 experiment. In 2011, green covers delayed fruit maturation slightly, but not in 2012. Covers did not affect vineyard rot incidence, the number of boxes of fruit harvested, or postharvest fruit quality in 2011, but fruit from covered grapevine had less postharvest rot in 2012 than fruit from noncovered grapevines, even though a measurable rain event occurred in 2011 but not in 2012. In conclusion, our results suggest that white covers may be preferable to green since green covers were associated with higher temperatures in both seasons and higher RH in the ?Autumn King? trial of 2012, but otherwise performed similarly.Original title and sourcesLate-season Plastic Canopy Covers Affect Canopy Microclimate and Fruit Quality of ?Autumn King? and ?Redglobe? Table GrapesMatthew W. Fidelibus1,4, Stephen J. Vasquez2 and S. Kaan Kurtural3 1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 956162 University of California Cooperative Extension, Fresno, CA 937023 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616HortTechnology April 2016 vol. 26 no. 2 141-147 http://horttech.ashspublications.org/content/26/2/141.abstract?etocPicture, table grapes near Bari, Italy
Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia Financiado por la Unión Europea